This graph shows Antibody production rose as is expected
following an initial infection. They maintained high levels
as CD4 counts fell and viral replication increased.
What are antibodies? Which cells in the immune system
produce them?
The high antibody titre is likely due to constant
exposure to the viral antigens. As replication of the virus
increases so does exposure and activation of B-cells
(antibody generating cells) and more antibodies specific for
HIV are produced. This data demonstrates that the subject is
experiencing constant exposure to HIV and that an antibody
response is unable to contain the infection.
Now let's compare this graph with results from an
earlier experiment...
Interesting...We know that the cell mediated response is
failing due to massive cell killing by the SHIV virus.If the
immune system was failing why are the antibody
concentrations are rising? Perhaps the B-cells of the immune
system remain functional even with breakdown of the T-cell
populaton. But if this interpretation is correct why is the
virus still thriving?
If antibodies were effective at neutralizing the
virus, why might enough still escape to maintain a
population?
What is the danger would a population of SHIV still
pose against the body even after being reduced to a small
amount? Would HIV posess the same threat?
The experimenters were vague when explaining changing
antibody levels in the subject choosing instead to focus on
the cell mediated side of the story. Nevertheless, whatever
action the antibodies may have for antigens it did contact
it is clear that the humoral response did not play as
significant a role in clearly out HIV as the cell
response.
In light of this fact, would you see any evolutionary
advantage for the HIV-like viruses to target the cell
mediated arm?