Neutralization of the homologous 168P PI
virus
Transgenic mice (hu CD4+, hu CCR5+, mouse CD4+) were
immunized with
( squares; n=3 ) or with(circles;n=3 mice).
Unimmunized mice were also used ( triangles;n=2 mice ). Sera
was tested for neutralization of 168P with U87-CD4 cells
expressing either CXCR4 (black symbols) or CCR5 (white
symbols)
Need help with graph interpretation of
Foci ( % control ) ?
In the neutralization assay, cells were
infected with a known amount of virus, cultures were reacted
with HIV antibody and a second (enzyme-linked) antibody.
Foci represent clusters of infected cells detected by
antibody similar to plaques or other CPE. % Foci is relative
to a control well with virus but no antiserum.
Therefore, the lower the Foci, the
greater amount of mouse sera antibody was able to neutralize
the 168P PI viruses.
a) the fusion-competent (FC)
vaccine immunogen ( squares; n=3 )
b) U87-CD4-CCR5 cells
(circles;n=3 mice)
c) U87-CD4-CCR5 cells cocultured with
mock-transfected COS cells (circles;n=3 mice)
.
Stop and think
#1: What do you think would
happen if the fusion-competent (FC) vaccine immunogen had
U87-CD4-CXCR4 cells instead of the U87-CD4-CCR5 cells?
Stop and think #2:
What does this suggest about the
neutralization with CXCR4, a coreceptor to which the animal
had not been exposed?
Stop and think #3:
In reference to figure 1, why the
increase in Foci with dilution?
You're one click away from going on to
the next Experiment
using Fusion-incompetent (FI) Immunogens