Results of the Transgenic Mouse Pilot Experiment

Figure 1

Neutralization of the homologous 168P PI virus

Transgenic mice (hu CD4+, hu CCR5+, mouse CD4+) were immunized with
( squares; n=3 ) or with(circles;n=3 mice).
Unimmunized mice were also used ( triangles;n=2 mice ). Sera was tested for neutralization of 168P with U87-CD4 cells expressing either CXCR4 (black symbols) or CCR5 (white symbols)

 

Need help with graph interpretation of Foci ( % control ) ?

In the neutralization assay, cells were infected with a known amount of virus, cultures were reacted with HIV antibody and a second (enzyme-linked) antibody. Foci represent clusters of infected cells detected by antibody similar to plaques or other CPE. % Foci is relative to a control well with virus but no antiserum.

Therefore, the lower the Foci, the greater amount of mouse sera antibody was able to neutralize the 168P PI viruses.

Fig. 1: Interpretations:

a) the fusion-competent (FC) vaccine immunogen ( squares; n=3 )

b) U87-CD4-CCR5 cells (circles;n=3 mice)

c) U87-CD4-CCR5 cells cocultured with mock-transfected COS cells (circles;n=3 mice)

.

Stop and think #1: What do you think would happen if the fusion-competent (FC) vaccine immunogen had U87-CD4-CXCR4 cells instead of the U87-CD4-CCR5 cells?

Stop and think #2: What does this suggest about the neutralization with CXCR4, a coreceptor to which the animal had not been exposed?

Stop and think #3: In reference to figure 1, why the increase in Foci with dilution?

You're one click away from going on to the next Experiment using Fusion-incompetent (FI) Immunogens

Back to the Main Menu